Nuclear power plants
Haidar Ali Ali Dad Mirzaai
Physical science
October, 2008
I against with Nuclear Power plants because if accidentally same
accident happens it will be disaster for our environment, life and for our future
generation. It would kill the people and makes theme sick, cancer and genetic
damage.
Uranium-235 is the isotope of uranium that is used in nuclear
reactors and for Nuclear Power Plants also they used the Plutonium, too. Nuclear
Power Station operate it the same like Conventional Thermal Power Station, only
the different between theme the fuel. For example in the Conventional Thermal
Power Station they use oil, gas and coal but for the Nuclear Power Station they use
the isotope of uranium and Plutonium. In Canada, they use Uranium-235 for fuel of
Nuclear Power plants. That Nuclear fission of Uranium-235 heats the water and
turn into steam than the turbine which activates a generator which produces
electricity.
The Chernobyl disaster was a nuclear reactor accident in the
Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in the Soviet Union. It was the worst nuclear power
plant accident in history. I am against because; it killed people, affected areas and
cancer deaths. it is so dangerous and it is not safety.
By the middle of august 1986, about 90,000 people were evocated
from the 81 effected towns and villages. Radiation affected more then 11.36 million
acres of fertile land in Ukraine. However, if the accident happens it will be affected
our fertile land and farmland so, it is disaster and I against with them.
The 2005 report prepared by the Chernobyl Forum, World Health
Organization (WHO), attributed 56 direct deaths (47 accident workers, and nine
children with thyroid cancer), and estimated that there may be 4,000 extra cancer
deaths among the approximately 600,000 most highly exposed people. Extra cancer
deaths among and slackness, it is disaster and I against.
Disaster of Nuclear Power it would affect his area and other city which is
near to that place. For example when the accident in the Chernobyl happened
however, the 2006 TORCH report stated that half of the volatile particles had
landed outside Ukraine, Belarus and Russia. I against no control after accident.
CANDU reactors already supply 15% of Canada's electricity,
including half the needs of the country's industrial and economic engine, Ontario.
Remarkably, they do this while creating relatively small amount of solid waste, with
an operating cost among the lowest of the available generating options. Small
amount of solid waste and makes the great current capacity it is excellent and I for
that great current.
Nuclear power has been presented as providing net environmental
benefits. Specifically, nuclear power makes no contribution to global warming
through the emission of carbon dioxide. Nuclear power also produces no notable
sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, or particulates. When nuclear power is produced,
nothing is burned in a conventional sense so I for with because no pollution.
I against with Nuclear Power plants because it is look like a nuclear
bomb. If the places are not safety and same grope would attack them it will be very
bad for our health, environment and planet.
1) - http://pro-resources.net/nuclear-terrorism.html
2) http://www.million-against-nuclear.net/
3) http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=154130&bolum=106
4) Poisoned power By John W. Gofman, Ph.D., M.D. and Arthur R. Tamplin, Ph.D.
5) Radiation Damage of Nuclear Power Plant Pressure Vessel Steels
N. N. Alekseenko, Am. Amaev, I. Gorynin, and V. A. Nikolaev1997 · Hardcover · 282 pages
